Latest News

# Burn: How We Really Burn Calories

This is a fascinating book by evolutionary biologist Herman Pontzer on how our basic metabolic needs and activity add up to our total daily energy expenditure.

It caught my eye because something about calories in/calories out has never seemed to add up for me. The conventional wisdom is that to determine your daily caloric needs, first go to a bmr calculator. This tells you your basal metabolic rate, or the number of calories your body will consume if you lay in bed all day. Then estimate your activity level, and a multiplier calculates your energy consumption for a typical day. The activity level tables are a little too vague for me. So alternatively, what I’ve always done is tell the calculator I’m sedentary to get my sedentary calories, then explicitly add in estimates of calories I burned exercising (say, in a two-hour bike ride). Now if I’m trying to lose weight, I just eat fewer calories than my estimate of what I’m burning. This works, but it never seems to be quite right, I always lose weight more slowly than the estimate. For example, if I estimate I’m burning 2600 calories a day, and only eat 2100, I should lose a pound a week (a deficit of 3500 calories should give one pound of weight loss).

But this never seems to work out, weight loss is always slower, a phenomenon many researchers have confirmed. But if you put people in a metabolic ward, where calories in and calories out are directly measured, and they are in a caloric deficit, they lose weight exactly as expected. So it’s not the concept of calories in vs. calories out that is incorrect. Dr. Pontzer shows convincingly that the problem is the calories-out estimate. The estimate is based on the assumption that basal metabolic rate and calories from activities just add up linearly. They do not: your body has many sophisticated compensation mechanisms, and when it senses you are undereating or have added more activity, it can make adjustments so other sources of energy expenditure are turned down. Dr. Pontzer calls this result “constrained daily energy expenditure”.

From Burn: New Research Blows the Lid Off How We Really Burn Calories, Lose Weight, and Stay Healthy. The left figure is what we intuitively expect: Total energy expenditure is physical activity expenditure plus expenditure from other metabolic sources. The right is what really happens. Our body has mechanisms, such as the hypothalamus, that turn down “other” expenditures to compensate for physical activity

How this is proven is a fascinating story in itself. It turns out there is a very accurate method I had not heard of using “double-labeled water” for measuring total daily energy expenditure. You can determine “calories out” for any species by getting a human or other animal to drink the high-tech water then doing lab work on their urine. The bottom line is that in the long run, total energy expenditure is related to the size of the individual, regardless of activity level.

From Burn: New Research Blows the Lid Off How We Really Burn Calories, Lose Weight, and Stay Healthy. Hadza men and women are far more physically active than most other people in the modern world, but their total energy expenditure is no higher than other people of the same body size. Admittedly there is a lot of scatter in the data, but you would if anything expect the Hadza to be well above the trend lines.

The Hadza are one of the last populations on earth still living a traditional hunter-gatherer lifestyle with little influence from the outside world. They are an impressive people, relatively small in stature but tough as nails and very intelligent. Their activity level is much higher than that of typical modern humans, but as the graph shows, their daily energy expenditure is pretty much the same as modern humans with the same body size. Another study Dr. Pontzer mentioned tracked sedentary people who trained to run a half-marathon a day, with their energy expenditure tracked through the process. As expected, their energy expenditure initially went up because of all the additional activity. But over time their bodies adjusted, and their energy expenditure went back down to not much more than it had been when they were sedentary.

This is a similar effect for people trying to lose weight as predictions of set-point theory, which predicts that your body will adjust to undereating by slowing your metabolism. But the new finding for me was that the same thing happens for physical activity.

Lest this should discourage people from exercising, there are a couple of important points to note. First, as Dr. Pontzer heavily emphasizes, exercise has many health and metabolic benefits beyond weight loss. I’ve made this point previously in a couple of articles urging people to put health first, not weight loss. Second, you can override your set point over time by losing weight gradually and sticking to unprocessed foods.

https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2017/08/hunter-gatherers-seasonal-gut-microbe-diversity-loss.html

These important findings about metabolism are not the only reason to read this book. The science explained by Dr. Pontzer is amazing, as are his first-hand descriptions of field research, such as participating in archaeological digs, living with the Hadza and observing their daily activities (including hunting and gathering), and collecting urine specimens from Orangutans.

Previous Post

Next article

Latest News

### Pizza Quinoa Casserole

Pizza Quinoa Casserole If you’re looking for a dinner that packs in the ...
Latest News

### 24 Best Home Workout Equipment, According to Fitness Experts 2023

Smart cardio machines, space-saving weights, and grippy yoga mats that bring the gym ...
Latest News

### Group Ride To The Southwest

Yesterday my group rode to the Southwest, first on rural roads up in ...

Latest News

Latest News